Related topics

COM dll server registration on Windows 64 bits
Since I paid quite a lot of money for my machine, I do not see why I shouldn't use all the precision the machine can give me without any extra cost! Note that NO EXTRA HARDWARE is needed! You just have to set the two precision bits in the CPU. And please note too that this will work from the 486 from Mr Falconer to

Sun will start shipping x86 Linux machines..
I think that Suns are still used where 64-bit capability is a requirement. What hasn't happened is the replacement of 32-bit machines by 64 bitters. I think that HP, IBM, I rebooted my machine, and it stopped dead in its tracks. As nothing had crashed, I was truly puzzled, and booted from my Syquest.

Reading an Excel sheet on x64 server
Only one OS at a time will be using any RAM at all, so they will never be sharing it. (Unless you use a virtual machine, as Colin said. It is so good, to finally have a 64 bit OS, my 4gb of ram recognized, and with drivers available that I need, I think I am going to enjoy this very much.

Sick of Windows, newbie thinking about Linux
Yes, the general install will work fine. Just how well all the apps run is a different story. Motherboard support, which was the OP's question, is fine, it recognised But they won't work on AMD64 ;-) From my limited expereince, my 32 bit machine runs better than my 64 bit. If I had it to do over again,

Mini newsgroup FAQ for the week of 2/24/2008
At the risk of stating the obvious, if time_t is 64-bit, then the argument of type time_t to localtime() and gmtime() will be 64-bit. You have more faith in the system C I don't know how often a machine lacks a 64 bit integer type, do you? Seems silly to make a fuss over something that isn't going to happen.

My first impressions - Vista 64 bit Ultimate
I also think you'd find that working at 32/44, probably even 64/44, wouldn't make your current machine even hiccup, because it doesn't make my machine It will be interesting, though, to see how things change as more plug-ins support 64-bit host/plug-in interfaces. One in particular I am glad has done that is

Apple II Csa2 FAQs: Input Devices, Part 15/25
One solution is to run Vista 64 bit on my machine and then Vista sees the whole 4 gig. (Unfortunately, there are still so many third-party devices that don't install on 64bit systems. <sigh> Another solution is to run Server 2008 on the real machine and then any guest will be fine.

int8 type -- call for porting results!
A good example of OS efficiency with user suited design is 64-bit IRIX with Magic. I just think the OS should be giving cycles to your apps and not taking .... Not nessisarily As for chip upgrades, Apple does it better - with processor cards... which means it is easier to replace the processor in my machine with

Upgrading to 64-bit Vista
Here is the info on the card: Apple Mach 64 113-32900-105 Previous owner sent a disk with two extensions: ATI Graphics Accelerator v1.2.9 ATI Graphics Driver v1.0 My machine: 7500, 604e @ 233mhz, OS8.6. Ok, here's my question: 1) Can I use this card in my Mac? Sounds like the card from a 9500. Should work fine.

Processing workload distribution
With vsynch on, my Geforce is not any faster than a TNT either. The TNT M64 only has a 64 bit bus against the original TNT, but a 64 bit bus is not a A PII 400 however, is not fast enough to show this, and you are likely to be more CPU limited at lower resolutions even with a TNT, and the M64 will not benefit

My first impressions - Vista 64 bit Ultimate
If the build toolchain has changed significantly then major work will be required to bring the port up to speed. In any event, Jarkko said that he had no more .... Yves felt that it could be fixed for 5.10.1. http://xrl.us/bgwv3 modified hints for Darwin x86 64bit (#50946) Daniel Quinlan supplied a patch to the

Best migration scenario for WSS 3.0 on SBS?
My machine was attacked, and shut down, even though I had the AV program up-to-snuff, and all applicable M$uks patches installed. Other "trojans" have pretty much At home I've stopped with Win2K SP2 and will go no further. At work I'm required to have SP4. It's their machine, they can do what they wish with it.

Somewhat OT - binary programming
-5 kills my machine -4 is still running you must have a fast machine. The default did finish and I tested one more mod. That treats the rest of P values like I see I have to do some mores work to get a proper bijective 64 bit version of a 2 state working and it will hold my intersest for the next few weeks.

Now THAT'S an Upgrade!
Besides, a good programmer is well aware of this and will make the necessary changes. Er, if it didn't break anything, you wouldn't need a good programmer who makes the necessary changes. :D That would be a bit impossible in some instances. My 32bit PPC programs work without breaking on the 64bit o/s using a 64-bit

New OS for Phoebe? Was Re: Was it hot at Wakefield today?
Neither can I. [snip] I'm only guessing that this is what the user will need (a 64-bit app) to do movies. But the C program development does support 64-bit apps when .... Just don't want the machine to be obsolete next year. And fast enough to last me for 8 years at least. On another area of my digging into Vista

IBM: Linux is ready for the Mainframe. SUN: No it's not!
The BBS generator is secure if you use less than log2 N values, so a 64-bit N would suffice for cryptographic level security. Also a 64-bit N should be easy to .... (At least as useful as letting my machine work on an RSA challenge, fold proteins, or looking for phone calls from ET.) -- Robert I. Eachus Ryan gunned

Where can I find OS 3.5
Mark jmhonz...@nospam.insightbb.com microsoft public windows 64bit general You really cannot compare x86 and x64 directly. They simply work differently. If you have a 32-bit application and run it on an x86 machine, it's doing as much as it can in one clock cycle. If you run the same 32-bit application and run it

Getting Free Disk Space and 64 bit data types
For instance, if we assume a modest 48Mb of RAM (like my machine has got..hehehe ;) and 16-byte pages then we've got 3145728 pages...say a page table entry is only 4-bytes big (but this is a small size because that's only 32-bits big...if we've got a 64-bit/128-bit machine, it'd surely be bigger ;) then we're

Gave up Vista as host
It is "implementation defined", so if your compiler manual says it will work, you are safe on your compiler. Thanks for that clarification. endless possibilities for varying floating point formats ... it's just fortunate that in my case the 64-bit "IEEE" floats are used in both the file and on my machine.

Ultrasparc 1 has no 64 bit pointers?
When there are actually 64-bit versions of these chips then there will be 64 bit OS's to run on them. Even if it isn't some Microsoft OS as long as they By the way, I will make my first real attempt at Linux tonight. I upgraded my machine a while back and I am going to use my old motherboard (P5-66) to put